Draft Electrical design guidance document 1.0, written by Ken Gale- updated 7th October 2025 – next step to be peer reviewed for buildability and losses etc
This design guidance document supports the wider team's understanding of the planned St P rooftop solar film installation.
For the worked example, BiPVco Flextron panels are integrated end-to-end with the AC power delivery, and cable sizing is developed around Sungrow SG125CX-P2 inverters.
The presentation walks the reader through each technical stage: from thin-film panel specification, to inverter selection, through cable sizing and containment, and on to switchgear interface.
The document seeks provides clear explanations, supporting calculations, and practical build notes to aid design, installation, and commissioning.



If due to NRHS rules, we cannot run separate earth conductors with DC cables and we want GRP/FRP (non-metal) cable trays which are to be located on the rear of the bull nose wave.
The following is a compliant path that still keeps the design safe and within the spirit of BS 7671 / IEC 60364-7-712.
*At the inverter : The inverter's PE terminal bonds to the building earthing system via the AC feeder (as described for the AC side). No DC earth conductor is run.
This guide helps implement lightning protection and surge protection for our wave roof solar PV system. It clarifies where devices should be placed on the DC and AC sides of each inverter, and how to choose between two schemes based on whether sufficient separation from the building's Lightning Protection System (LPS) can be maintained.
→ Deliberately bond at a defined point and upgrade to Type 1+2 (or Type 1 on AC service entrance) so devices can handle partial lightning current.
(As our project has parapet/tower interfaces—assume Scheme B for those sections unless the LPS designer certifies you can keep separation everywhere.)
In this scheme, the DC side relies on a double-insulated cable approach where the protective measure is double/reinforced insulation, rather than earthing of DC conductors.
Use H1Z2Z2-K or PV1-F double-insulated cables without separate earth conductors for all DC cabling.
Update cable containment sizing to reflect the removal of separate DC earth conductors.
The illustration shows a solar film array that is arranged as four waves of PV strings per inverter (total 14 Sungrow units), shown in green
The primary containment route (indicated in purple) traverses the two span beams onto the metal work of the glass roof
The main AC containment passes around the West Tower and drops to the Midland Road lower roof for building entry to the Energy Centre - switchgear room.
To quantify the DC ohmic losses per string - simple sizing rule + schedule for the 4-waves-per-inverter layout.
How far is each string from the inverter?
With 4 waves feeding one inverter, the DC strings home-run along the span beam. A tidy planning set is to consider four representative one-way distances to the inverter plinth (add ~10 m allowance for local drops, over-nose routing, and verticals):

To quantify the DC ohmic losses per string - simple sizing rule + schedule for the 4-waves-per-inverter layout.
where = one-way length (m), factor 2 = out

Recommended cable size (simple rule):
What about the other losses:
Typical whole-system loss budget (annualised order-of-magnitude):

We are focusing on flexible cabling alternatives that offer significant advantages over traditional stiff armoured cables due to their smaller overall diameter and improved bend radius. Specifically, we will detail the characteristics and benefits of using single-core LSZH cables in tray for AC applications, relying on a Circuit Protective Conductor (CPC) for earthing.
Here are the practical options, with when/why you'd pick them:
To quantify the DC ohmic losses per string - simple sizing rule + schedule for the 4-waves-per-inverter layout, utilizing the more flexible double-insulated DC cables (H1Z2Z2-K or PV1-F) in tray.




We gain better efficiency and fewer AC feeders, with the "4 waves → 1 inverter" scheme and the DC:AC ratio is into the sweet spot without changing string length
Per strict 4-wave block:
(But ,if we use the spare MPPT to take an extra 4×8S from the next block, the inverters could carry 320 + 28 + 32 = 380 modules.)
If we keep it strictly "4 waves/inverter", each inverter uses 11 of 12 MPPTs (one spare). If you let the spare MPPT take four extra 8S strings from the next block, we can run the plant on 13 inverters (our optimised plan); otherwise, it's 14 inverters exactly (one per 4-wave block).
The solar film panels produces DC (Direct Current) power, which then needs to be converted to AC (Alternating Current) for use in the Station
In this example design, we are using the Flextron F33F-360BM1 that are part of the 990 mm-wide family from BIPVco. Key specs:
These panels are designed to minimise power loss when partially shaded, thanks to built-in bypass diodes.
Each wave on the roof is divided into 3 sections ( A, B & C) by two concrete span columns, where the DC peak capacity is shown below:

A string is a group of solar film panels connected in a line (in series). Their voltages add up but the current stays the same

But, if too many solar film panels are connected in one string, this can exceed voltage limits, especially in cold weather when voltage rises

To stay within the 1,000 V module rating required for each inverter:
Inverters convert DC electricity from the panels into AC electricity for use in the station.
Each inverter has multiple MPPTs (Maximum Power Point Trackers), these are smart inputs that optimize power from each string.
Think of an inverter as a stereo with 12 volume knobs (MPPTs). Each knob controls a group of speakers (strings). MPPTs adjust each group to get the best sound (power), even if some are shaded or tilted differently.

Approach B (4 strings per MPPT, Y-paralleled): 154 MPPT rows across 13 inverters:
Approach B (4 strings per MPPT, Y-paralleled): 154 MPPT rows across 13 inverters:
Y-paralleled means two identical PV strings are connected in parallel using a Y-branch so they share one inverter input.
How it's wired: An MC4 Y-connector combines the + of String 1 with the + of String 2 (and likewise the − with −). That single pair then lands on one DC input of an MPPT, utilizing double-insulated PV cable specifications (H1Z2Z2-K or PV1-F) rather than separate earth conductors.
What changes electrically:
Approach B (4 strings per MPPT, Y-paralleled): 154 MPPT rows across 13 inverters
In our design: one string ≈ 3.84 A → two in parallel ≈ 7.7 A per input. The Sungrow SG125CX-P2 allows ~20 A per input / 30 A per MPPT, so you can run two strings per input and hence four strings per MPPT (two per input).
Rules of thumb:
Sungrow SG125CX-P2, a 1000 V-class inverter with excellent string handling.
For the first third of a wave (Section A) and using our chosen Approach B (4 strings per MPPT):
Cables that occupy in the first 1/3 (Section A) of a wave:
How many cables in this 1/3 wave:
Hence, in our design for Section A, each string uses 3 x pairs of DC conductors, where we are using six H1Z2Z2-K or PV1-F double-insulated runs. These will be installed in tray with an approximate Typical OD (95 mm²): ~18–20 mm each.
Cable route and fixing on the cladding face (outside the cavity) on the rear of the bull nose of wave:


Primary Cable Containment — Fixed to top of span beams (Approach B: 4 strings/MPPT, 13 inverters)
So the job of that primary DC run is exactly to carry 44 string pairs (88 single-core cables) from the four waves along the span beam to the inverter plinth, using the tray sizes above
For whole solar film array, end-to-end, for Approach B (4 strings/MPPT, 13 inverters)
Headline numbers:
Cable type: 0.6/1 kV LSZH single-core (e.g., 6491B / H07Z-K or equivalent)
Configuration: 3 × phase + 1 × CPC (earth) run in trefoil or flat formation on ladder
Overall diameter (OD) per single-core cable: ~18–20 mm each
Minimum bend radius (per single-core cable): ≥ 12×OD installed (i.e., ~0.22–0.24 m); use 15×OD during pulling. Minimum bend radius is approx. 24 cm
Cleat spacing (for single-core cables): ~300–450 mm on straight runs; closer at bends/tees, and ensuring formation integrity.
Normal design load per inverter feeder: ≈ 185 A (125 kW ÷ (√3·400 V·η))
This is well within the clipped-direct rating of three 95 mm² Cu LSZH single-core (e.g., 6491B / H07Z-K or equivalent) cables run in trefoil or flat formation on ladder (typically ≥ 230–260 A, depending on install method/ambient).
Conductor resistance (90 °C): = 0.206 Ω/km
Reactance: = 0.08 Ω/km
For the longest run ~140 m at 185 A, 3-phase voltage drop is about:
→ ≈
9.8 V drop → ≈ 2.4 % of 400 V (with cosφ=0.98)
This is inside a common ≤3 % design target.
Cable: "3x95mm² + 1x95mm² LSZH single-core (e.g., 6491B / H07Z-K or equivalent) 0.6/1 kV, run in trefoil or flat formation on ladder/tray; OD ~18–20 mm each; design load 185 A."
Use 2 × 400 mm × 100 mm ladders on the primary AC corridor (13 feeders total), or one 400 mm × 100 mm per span-beam bundle where they run separately.
Fixed along the wall of West Tower, over the parapet and down the façade (architectural cowling) – to be detailed by others




Electrical design guide to St P Solar film project